Hits and Misses

This is the golden age of great city mayors.



In Chicago, Richard Daley transformed "Beirut on the Lake" into one of the world's great cities -- a sophisticated, vibrant, seedbed for an astonishing array of enlightened "green" programs.

In Denver and San Francisco, two restaurateurs -- respectively John Hickenlooper and Gavin Newsom -- transplanted their customer service credo into city services and designed revolutionary programs for the homeless. Also, Hickenlooper's determined regional fence-mending produced a 70 percent approval rating in the metro area, and he in turn used this reservoir of good will to lead seven counties and 31 cities to pass a sales tax increase to pay for 119 miles of new light rail and commuter trains costing $5 billion.

In Atlanta, Shirley Franklin slashed 1,000 jobs as well as her own salary, convinced 75 companies to analyze city government at no cost, and began a 22-mile linear park connecting 45 neighborhoods. Through force of personality, Jerry Abramson convinced Louisville citizens to approve the largest government consolidation in 40 years; New York's Michael Bloomberg turned a projected $6.5 billion deficit into a $3 billion surplus; Baltimore's Martin O'Malley developed a unique computerized complaint system making city departments more accountable; Miami's Manny Diaz moved the city bond rating from junk to A+ while rolling out a six-year program to rebuild the infrastructure; and Washington Mayor Anthony Williams delivered something thought impossible: stability.

In other words, cities are in an epic period of rebirth, and great mayors are the reason. Memphis has had great managers, great motivators, and great speakers. But Memphis hasn't had a mayor who measures up to the standards of today's great leaders.

Mayor Willie W. Herenton, contrary to critics who tend to blame him for everything from the economic downturn to global warming, flirted with a "Nixon to China" brand of greatness, but in the end, it now seems as elusive as his being cheered at half court at FedExForum.

In truth, the concept of Willie Herenton has always been even more compelling than the reality of Willie Herenton. To his political base, he has special status as the city's first African-American mayor, and the voter loyalty attached to that milestone will not be replicated again. To civic leaders, statements of support frequently begin with the sentence, "He's better than . . . ."

When a political image outstrips personal reality, it's often a good thing for the politician. The formidable image silences critics, drives public opinion, and overwhelms public discussions. In Herenton's case though, it's no longer fair to him, and it's not fair to the city, because it has mutated into a mythology that polarizes every issue he touches.

The seminal example took place just over a year ago when he convened a meeting to consider his innovative proposal for merger of the two local school systems. On that day, Herenton made the best researched and most detailed analysis by a public official of the $1 billion spent locally each year for schools, and he did it all without mentioning once that Memphis is the only major metro area in Tennessee where schools aren't already consolidated.

And yet, none of the statistics, none of the projections, and none of the historical trends were reported. Instead, the media fixated on the fact that the chairs of the city and county school boards -- respectively, Wanda Halbert and David Pickler -- were petulant no-shows at the meeting.

It was a defining moment in the Herenton Era, because it was at that moment that it became unambiguously obvious that his personality, not his positions or programs, would be the overriding factor in defining the news from then on. In this way, it no longer mattered if he was right, because he had been robbed of his bully pulpit.

The sad truth of Memphis politics -- and it is sad whether you support Herenton or not -- is that the ultimate prisoner of the Herenton myth is now Willie Herenton himself. Because of it, he's denied the chance to emulate great U.S. mayors who are creating bigger dreams for their cities that every one sees themselves being part of, reaching across political and racial boundaries and inspiring all of their citizens with the confidence to move ahead together.

It is a truism that every city is only one great mayor away from being a great city. No one knows this better than Herenton, and that's why the question that only he can answer is so tough.

Like the talented boxer that he once was, he knows that he can keep winning, but he also knows that sometimes, the skill is not just in being able to win, but in knowing when it is no longer necessary to be in the ring.

Add your comment: